Cognitive structure stage nine (from
10
or 12 to about 18 years.)
Full functionality
is built.
This
in a sense is the last stage of development where a child is becoming
an
adult, and mentally a fully functioning being. It is also the stage
where each
personal map of reality gradually becomes an integrated fully
functioning tool for
predicting. Although growth in the brain is never fully complete and
cannot be, during this stage it becomes complete enough to accomplish
almost anything humans can accomplish. Greenspan and Shanker in their
book "The First Idea" see this stage mostly in the form of building an
internal standard against which everything can be measured and judged
and of course
a map or model of reality is a standard. It is important to be clear,
however, that although approaching completion during this stage,
neither map or standard is
actually complete until the end of this stage. Greenspan and Shanker
say:
"By puberty and early
adolescence,
more complex emotional interactions and thinking build a ninth level -
an internal standard based on a growing internal sense of self. This
process, which builds during the adolescent and adult years, can begin
as early as ten or twelve years as children gradually create a more
defined sense of self."
Full reflective ability is built.
Greenspan and Shanker remind
us that although a complete ability to reflect on the world is normally
built in our brains during this stage, it has been difficult for
psychological science to understand how it is normally built. They
explain that this is because philosophy, psychology etc. have always
separated emotion from cognitive processes while they believe emotion
is an essential ingredient in all cognitive processes. They say:
"Cognitive,
educational, and learning theory has not been able to develop an
adequate model to figure out or explain how to promote the highest
levels of reflective thinking because it is not focused on the role of
emotion. In other words, the highest levels of thinking require
combined emotional and cognitive development because they involve
comparing frames of reference, which have to be based on ongoing
emotional experiences and a complex internal sense of self."
Inferences from comparing two
frames of reference.
During this stage as the
internal standard or map of reality is becoming more and more perfect
the ability to infer outcomes, meanings etc. become both more prolific
and and more accurate. This happens as the tools of language and logic
are put to work to create frames of reference which can be compared,
and a standard that provides more and more accurate information to
thread through those frames. Greenspan
and Shanker explain this expansion in logic and creativity:
At
this stage, children become more able to make more inferences. Inferences
mean thinking in more than one frame of reference at the same time, or
creating a new idea from existing ones. To use more than one frame of
reference one needs to have an 'agency' that can do the looking and
relating. One of the two frames of reference that are being compared
must be based on an organized sense of self that is the product of
meaningful experience. Intelligent inferences involve all the
developmental levels we have been describing as well as emotionally
meaningful experience in the sphere of knowledge where the inference is
being made. Both are required. Experience and knowledge in the area
where the inference is made are necessary for sophisticated inferences
rather than naive ones."
"The
new ability to think in two perspectives - objective reality and
personal opinion - at the same time separates individuals who remain
somewhat more concrete (they haven't mastered this level) from those
who have. For those who have, the door is now open to the higher levels
of intelligence and reflectiveness that will be characteristic of
adolescent and adult thinking."
Weening us from
testing theories.
Although
the ability to test theories was
developed at an earlier stage it becomes very important during this
stage. During this stage as we try to add the theories currently held as true by our society we start to realize the impossibility of testing them all. The shear mass of theories humans have
invented over time begins to act to ween us from testing every theory by
force their numbers. Although
the testing of our theories tends to show us how tentative such
theories are and should be for various reasons we tend to abandon such
tentativeness at this stage. On the one hand we are forced by social
pressures to stop testing theories and start accepting the theories of
others wholesale. On the one hand we simply do not have enough time to
test the vast array of theories that society needs us to absorb.
However, there is much to be said for occasionally testing theories at
random and trying to retain the tentativeness that follows testing.
Swallowing theories whole tends to give them a full sense of
certainty that can ultimately prevent real learning and the occasional
testing of theories gives us an overall confidence in theory, greater
understanding, and better recall of those theories. Greenspan and
Shanker explain how hypothesis making and testing lead to all kinds of
new creative types of thinking:
"During
the early adolescent years, the ability to consider the future as well
as the past and present broadens the sense of self, an internal
standard based on it, and the hypothesis-making abilities that lead to
inference and other types of creative thinking. Probabilistic thinking
about the future, however, can be more readily applied to areas such as
math and science than others, such as personal plans. Emotional
investing in the future comes at the next stage."
The construction of
values and ideals.
From
a social point of view, values and ideals can now be constructed,
debated and argued. To be sure, there will be all kinds of trial
balloons as teenagers experiment and argue for cultural norms that are
different from those of their parents. Nonetheless, such debates signal
a whole new level of social and cultural understanding. It creates the
foundations not only for understanding values and ideas and pursuing
them but also for investing institutions with stable personal beliefs
that can sustain whole societies; for example, concepts and
institutions that support justice.
The adolescent/adult
sense of
self.
During
this stage of
development the sense of self should completely solidify into not only
what a self is, but into what a self could be if the child has managed
to satisfy his/her basic needs and is able to turn outwards to be
inclusive of others into that self. The self can expand to envelop parents, friends,
relatives, clans, and culture. In this way the child develops values
and judgments of how relationships should be. Ideals of truth, justice,
fairness are no longer about what is good for one's self within one's
skin but rather becomes about the welfare of lovers, friends, humanity
and even other animals. Values at this stage can be accommodated from
others who are not caregivers. There is a far greater awareness of
other
role models at this stage and many of them become highly
influential. Greenspan and Shanker
explain:
"That sense of self, in turn
constitutes an inner standard by which to
judge experience. For example they can say for the first time, 'I
shouldn't be so angry because the insult wasn't that great.' Similarly,
they can look at peers who are doing something naughty and say, 'I
shouldn't do that because it isn't the right thing for me to do. It may
be okay for them.' A child aged from ten to twelve and beyond can have a
hard time on the playground and still feel like a good person. In
contrast, an eight-year-old might feel like a bad person instead of
being able to apply her inner standard. Using that internal standard a
child can now look at history and say, 'I agree with the North (or the
South) for the following reasons.' Or, 'In the First World War I think
that that when people behaved that way they were exercising bad
judgment.'"
"The
sense of self now embraces a new agency as values and ideals gradually
become an integral part of the self. The self has also expanded to
include the two dimensions we've been discussing - the one
that
operates in the emotions of the day-to-day events, and the one that can
now evaluate how they feel, what they've done, and plan to change and
improve. They can also use this new level of reflective awareness for
self directed criticism and anger as well as to praise or invigorate
themselves."
Democracy and the investment in
social values.
The development and
investment in social values, that is part of this stage of development,
is essential for producing what we might term moral adults, which in
turn are necessary to produce a society where democracy is possible.
Greenspan and Shanker make this clear:
The
ability to reflect an internal sense of self and standard may be viewed
as one of the basic capacities required to support values and in
situations commonly associated with representative democracies. Such
forms of government require a certain percent of the population to
invest in abstract principles such as justice and the institutions that
support it ('the consent of the governed.' according to Jefferson). Only
individuals who can think from an internal standard and a sense of self
can invest in abstract principles and institutions. Individuals unable
to do this are more likely to adhere to a specific leader or a concrete
belief.
The turning point or choice in
becoming an adult.
The
former gray areas of thinking typical of the previous stage tends to
harden again into all or nothing thinking. The extent to which this
happens is largely dependent on the amount of personal testing the
child manages to accomplish which keeps the child grounded in reality
and concreteness. Ideally the rather black and white values that
develop at the beginning of this stage should tend to mellow with
further experience into tentative gray area thinking again. Greenspan
and Shanker put it like this:
"If
children remain mired in all-or-nothing thinking, they are likely to
take extreme positions about themselves. On the other hand, if they've
progressed adaptively through the different stages, through gray-area
thinking, they can use this new self-observing ability to take a honest
look at their behavior and then plan accordingly. Because this process
is just beginning (as are values and cultural norms), there will be lots
of experimentation. We will see a mixture of harsh or extreme attitudes
alongside what appear to be very reasonable ones. Nonetheless, an
entirely new level of self-reflection and, therefore, conscious
awareness of the world is now possible."
The false sense of certainty.
During this stage each
personal
map each child has been building of reality, becomes a genius machine
that can predict the world about effortlessly. It's predictions are
right often enough for people to start accepting it's predictions as
sure. This seeming perfection gives humans a false sense of certainty
that can lead to regression in the adult stages of development.
|