Cognitive
Structure Filling in the Blanks.
Mapping reality a
limit.
There is a limit to what we
can know. Yet for a personal map of reality
to be fully functional all the gaps about how the world works must be
filled so it can function as an integrated whole. Since it is
impossible to have all the information necessary what happens is these
final holes in the personal map of reality are filled in with
metaphysical information that cannot be tested. It is not scientific
and these bits of knowledge may correctly be called myths. It is these
myths or beliefs that give each map its wholeness and also much of its
uniqueness. When
these final beliefs are put in place the map becomes for the first time
a single whole integrated pattern. It is quickly able to do far more
than before. It is as if the conjectures and theories become something
far more than what they were individually.
A gestalt.
The
personal map of reality becomes a gestalt. The dictionary tells us that
a gestalt is: A physical, biological, psychological, or symbolic
configuration or pattern of elements so unified as a whole that its
properties cannot be derived from a simple summation of its parts. An
organized whole that is perceived as more than the sum of its parts. A
structure, configuration, or pattern of physical, biological, or
psychological phenomena so integrated as to constitute a functional
unit with properties not derivable by summation of its parts. As a
functioning personal map of reality is capable of doing far more than
the sum of its parts gestalt seems most appropriate.
Closure.
A branch
of psychology called Gestalt Psychology was much concerned with the
ability of the mind to make wholes out of things that were not wholes.
For instance when we see a circle with a gap in it we tend to see it as
a circle not as an arc. We close the gap
automatically. This is essentially what the mind does in completing a
personal map of reality. It fills in what we do not know with something
so that we can know it. What it fills in is both personal and cultural.
What it fills in are myths.
Myths build slowly over a
long period of time.
The final stage in the
development of a
personal map of reality can not properly be called a stage. For some it
may be a stage but for others and to some extent all people most of it
is something that happens during all the other stages. The cultural
myths in particular do not usually come at some late stage but rather
develop slowly over time.
Such things as religion, our prejudices and beliefs about what is moral
or right or good are things that can not be tested yet they are major
players in all our actions and motives. What happens at this stage (if
it is a stage) is these myths are committed to.
What are some of these myths and what is
their importance?
Well of course there are the religious
myths. These were of utmost importance in times gone by and still are
of huge importance to some people. These days most people probably do
not believe in god and even when they do believe in god they are not
very sure. In times gone by the god myth gave structure to people's
lives. It provided people with motivation and it gave their lives
meaning. There are other minor myths that guide our lives many of which
we have retained without the original of their source in religion. Such
things as superstitions can enable us to do some things and prevent us
from doing others. We may believe in things like luck and going with
runs of luck. A surprising number of people believe in what might be
called conspiracies (people are plotting sometimes against them or
others). Some people believe in flying saucers or UFOs. Communism was
also such a belief for those who believed in it unconditionally.
The important myths today are probably
psychological and sociological myths. Some people believe in a
particular brand of psychology to solve all life's problems. Some of
these myths are not only common to all people but also have a profound
influence on the success and well being they feel while they are alive.
Many of these take the form of dichotomies in that if you do not
believe one view you believe in an opposite view. Generosity and
stinginess, kindness and cruelty, are examples of character trait
myths. Some people believe in synergy in that they believe if they help
others it will come back to them in kind as in earning merit, while others believe in the
law of the jungle where it is dog eat dog, looking out for number one
and one-upmanship. Some people believe that work is fun and part of
play, while others believe that work is drudgery and play is childish
and immoral.
Mindsets.
Three myths in
particular have been shown in exhaustive scientific studies to have a
massive impact on our lives. It has been clearly shown, that with each
of these, one orientation (or mindset) is clearly superior to the
other:
-
Pessimism
or optimism orientation. Pessimism and optimism are very old
concepts. But until recently nobody had thought to investigate and
really find out scientifically if these orientations really did effect
peoples lives and if one was preferable to the other. Martin Seligman
and his colleagues set about just such a series of studies.
Pessimism. What was discovered
in this multitude of studies was that pessimism tended to lead to what
Seligman liked to call 'learned helplessness' which ultimately led to
inactivity and depression. Why bother to do anything if things were
going to go bad anyway. The best strategy for the pessimist is not to
take risks, to avoid dangers and be unnoticed. Pessimism also seemed to
generally make people anxious, worried, basically unhappy and seemed to
inevitably lead to failure. All this is self reinforcing for the
pessimist.
Optimism. Optimism on the other
hand was found in the studies to lead to success, confidence, happiness
and the finding of joy in activity. Optimists believe that if things
are bad they will get better. They see opportunities all the time
because they believe they are there and are looking for them. Their
world looks beautiful and friendly and when it is not they know it will
become so. Optimists were found to be healthier, more able to do
things and to take more pleasure in what they do and experience. All
this is of course self reinforcing to the
optimist.
-
Control or
autonomous orientation. Controlling
and autonomous concepts have also been around for quite some time
especially control. Those social psychologists studying intrinsic
motivation particularly Edward Deci and Richard Ryan and their
colleagues began to detect a direct connection between controlling
activity and loss of intrinsic motivation while autonomous behavior
they noticed led to increased intrinsic motivation.
Control. Feeling controlled
leads to behavior that is intended to control others which in turn
leads to those others feeling that they are being controlled. There are
only two ways to deal with controlling behavior. One way is by
compliance and the other is by resisting. Compliance even in order to
get something like a reward leaves us feeling we do not have control of
our lives and a loss of self esteem. The only way for controlling and
controlled people to restore some semblance of ego and feel they have
have some control is to try and find it in controlling others. But
controlling others and being controlled ourselves has been shown in
studies to make us anxious, tense and unhappy, it also has been shown
to make us less creative, less competent and less interested in doing
things when not being controlled and less able to find new
interests.
Autonomy. Feeling autonomous
leads to behavior that is intended to help others attain autonomy which
in turn leads to people feeling that they in control of themselves and
their own destiny. Autonomy or Self-determination is all about choices,
options and differing possibilities to pick from. People who are
themselves autonomous desire this freedom for others and thus try to
the best of their ability to provide others with choices and encourage
others to make their own decisions. Only by the example of their own
views and actions do they try to influence those choices and never by
threat or offering rewards. The studies showed that autonomous people
in feeling self-determined and helping others to also feel
self-determined, tend to be relaxed, happy, challenged, competent and
creative. Autonomous people feel they are operating optimally and using
their most of their capacities more often. They also tended to maintain
or increase their interest in things and also find and develop new
interests more easily.
-
Fixed or
growth orientation. Fixed and growth concepts have sort of
been around for a log time but for some reason we have not related them
greatly to people. Carol Dweck and a group of other social
psychologists have only recently exposed the importance of these two
orientations or mindsets, in an exhaustive series of studies, as
enabling people to function well in life or to function badly.
Fixed. Feeling that your
abilities are fixed and cannot be changed also usually leads to
encouraging those around you to suffer in a similar manner. People with
a fixed mindset believe that things cannot be changed and especially
that they themselves are fixed and unchanging in their abilities and
intelligence. Not only that but people with this mindset seem to fear
being found out as impostors who do not really have these abilities or
intelligence. They have a compulsion to demonstrate their abilities and
intelligence over and over. At the same time they are afraid of
attempting new things because of the possibility of failure. They
choose the easy path but because of the necessity of maintaining the
esteem of others they often resort to cheating and lies. Because
abilities are fixed for people who have this mindset they produce
little effort to learn, change or improve themselves. Why would they if
they believe change is impossible? In fact fixed mindset people believe
that people with great abilities and intelligence can do everything
easily and that effort shows that they are actually of lesser ability.
If fixed mindset people become great (which is not so often) it is only
because they did show early promise, who were in fact prodigies who did
thing easily and with little effort. This greatness often leads to a
fall, as they are unable to admit their mistakes and learn from them.
They tend to feel pressured to live up to their own early potential.
Fixed mindset people were found in the studies to be unhappy and
anxious.
Growth. Feeling that your
abilities need improvement and that you can improve them also usually
leads to encouraging those around you to similarly work hard and and
improve their abilities. People with a growth mindset believe
everything can be changed and improved if only some effort is made to
change it. They believe they can improve their abilities and their
intelligence by working hard enough and long enough, by putting in
enough effort. Such people feel no need to demonstrate their abilities
which they tend to judge only against what they were able to do before,
they judge themselves only by their improvement and not against
external standards. Growth mindset people also do not fear failure and
tend to redouble their effort when they fail. People with a growth
mindset work hard and long hours but seem to enjoy doing it. If people
with this mindset become great it is often difficult to guess from
their early development that they would, for they often show no early
promise. In greatness they tend to maintain or improve their greatness
and do not falter. Growth mindset people were found in the studies to
be happier and more
confident.
Linchpins.
All these beliefs
have in common that they are metaphysical theories which cannot be
tested in themselves although the results of believing in the can
indeed be tested. These beliefs however are often a linchpin that holds
together
each person's map of reality.
A
growth orientation for instance provides an essential element that
erects a meta infrastructure in our maps of reality that places
learning at the center of all mental activity. If this belief is taken away
or altered what happens is a complete reorganizing of that map of
reality. This in turn means they are difficult to change once they are
set where one option is believed in to a greater extent than the other.
These myths are usually maintained by out side 'seeming verification', by
outside messages from others and from internal messages that we give
ourselves.
Building the myths
we want.
Although this site has used Carol
Dweck's
word 'mindset' to describe some of these myths it is a bit of a
misnomer as it gives the impression that once these myths are formed it
is difficult to change them and so it is in the long run or
permanently. However in the short term it is relatively easy to change
these mindsets. It is just an matter of sending the right message to
somebody about what they are doing or about to do. Many of the studies
of these mindsets come from controlled experiments where the particular
mindset of the participants was set for each group by the experimenter.
Just telling group of people that I.Q. is set for life once uncovered
or telling another group that intelligence can be increased by the
amount of effort that is put into learning will have a remarkable
effect both on people's mindsets and their perceived intelligence.
People with a fixed mindset appear to get stupider while those with the
growth mindset appear to become more intelligent.
Myths have to be
maintained.
Many of these myths
especially those formed late
in life
have to be maintained by the mind because they have very few links to
the personal map of reality. They fill holes in the map of reality that
can be structurally critical, but they are not deeply embedded in it in
terms of the number of links to different information. Prejudices and
irrational beliefs especially have to be
gone over and over in the mind to widen the pathways to the links which
would otherwise shrink and disappear. Another way to construe this is
to think of it as keeping something in short term memory because there
are not enough links to embed it in long term memory.
People are always trying to
sell this basically irrational information to others. People who have
prejudices are always trying to convince you that their view is
correct.
The white person who believes he is more intelligent than black people
or better than black people will try to convince you that whites are
more intelligent or better than blacks. People who drink will try to
convince you to drink. People who believe that aliens walk amongst us
will try to convince you it is so. Optimists and pessimists will also
try to convince you that their view of the world is correct. People who
evangelize their religion are in part keeping their beliefs alive in
short term memory. People try to convince you of these things, do this
in part, to create others like themselves, but more importantly they do
it to resell it to themselves. The main reason that they do it is to
keep it alive within themselves.
|